← Back to projects

Metal sheet factory

Klang

Metal sheet factory — owner-selected hero

Developing an efficient foundation strategy for heavy industrial loading on reclaimed land.

Designed by Alen Teh Architects, the proposed metal sheet factory in Klang measures approximately 75 m by 171 m, with a building height of around 20 m. Located on reclaimed land, the development presented significant engineering challenges arising from heavy industrial floor loading, production pits and the underlying ground conditions. The structural design focused on establishing appropriate design loads and developing a cost-effective piled foundation solution.

Establishing the design loads

The manufacturing operations required floor loading of up to 20 tonnes/m². The loading demands and their implications for the floor slab and foundation design were reviewed before the design loads were agreed. This allowed the client to understand the relationship between operational requirements and construction costs, providing an informed basis for agreeing the design loads.

Optimising the piled foundations

The combination of reclaimed ground and substantial industrial loading required careful consideration of the piled foundation arrangement. Alternative precast pile sizes and configurations were assessed to achieve an efficient distribution of loads while controlling foundation costs.

The study identified opportunities to reduce construction costs through foundation optimisation while meeting the agreed operational requirements.

Minimising retaining walls through rationalised pit design

The process pits were rationalised into larger excavations, minimising the extent of retaining walls requiring costly temporary sheet piling in weak ground. Smaller pits were then accommodated within these larger pits as conventional non-retaining structures, reducing construction complexity and cost.

Client

Undisclosed

Architect

Alen Teh Architects

Design and Build Contractor

Project Manager

Interior Designer

Years

2023

Size

Approx. 138,047 ft²

Project Cost

Services

Structural engineering

Geotechnical engineering

Civil engineering

Project Status

Scope completed

Tender Documentation

Original Visual: Alen Teh Architects

DIVE DEEPER

Ohr initiated this study with the client to demonstrate how the placement and stacking of materials on the factory floor could significantly affect engineering requirements and construction costs. By examining the proposed operations together, we helped the client make informed choices about the investment in their new facility.

01

Establish the operational needs

Work with the client to understand where materials would be stored, how they would be stacked and the weights the floor would need to support.

02

Show the engineering implications

Translate the proposed arrangements into floor loads, then assess how different choices affect slab depths, pile sizes, pile spacing and estimated construction costs.

03

Support an informed investment

Give the client a clear comparison of operational capacity and construction cost, so the design brief reflects considered choices about the new facility.

Material placement shapes the design

The study made the connection between storage arrangements, floor loading and construction provision tangible. These three examples show how alternative coil-stacking requirements changed the slab and foundation solution and its estimated cost.

Two-tier stacking

15-tonne coils below
10-tonne coils above

134 kN/m²

Pile grid
2.25 × 2.25 m

Square precast piles
350 / 400 mm

Slab + piling estimate
RM2,308/m²

Heavier two-tier stacking

25-tonne coils below
15-tonne coils above

165 kN/m²

Pile grid
2 × 2 m

Square precast piles
350 / 400 mm

Slab + piling estimate
RM2,723/m²

Heavier three-tier stacking

25-tonne coils below
Two tiers of 15-tonne coils above

226 kN/m²

Pile grid
2 × 2 m

Square precast piles
450 mm

Slab + piling estimate
RM4,684/m²

Informed decisions from the outset

The exercise helped the client balance operational requirements with the cost of providing them. It established a considered basis for the design loads from the outset, avoiding reliance on a generic allowance that could provide unnecessary capacity in some areas or insufficient capacity in others.

Illustrative options from the original design-stage study. Estimates use the study’s assumed rates and exclude pile caps and formwork. Pile sizes vary between internal and perimeter bays where shown. These options provide different storage capacities; the cost differences are not like-for-like savings or savings realised in construction.